Handle your employees with care. Though oft said, the dictum remains true: employees really are your firm’s most valuable assets.

Click here to view original article.

By James S. Cassel
December 31, 2013

No matter what size or type of business you own, your success depends largely on the people who comprise your team. The decisions you make in all phases of the employment cycle — recruiting, hiring, training, retaining, evaluating, and promoting, laying off or firing — are critical.

Based on my experience over the years helping middle-market business owners, I believe that they often don’t give the necessary attention to many basic principles. Employment decisions are often made by the wrong people, at the wrong time, for the wrong reasons, and without the proper considerations. Here’s some practical advice I have found helpful.

Recruiting, interviewing and hiring. This process begins before you even look at the first résumé. First, you should identify what characteristics you need in your prospective hires and carefully determine who within your firm should become involved in the process of creating job descriptions, screening résumés and conducting interviews. While the CEO of a mid-size firm may not be directly affected by a bad entry-level hire, such a hire might create tremendous burdens for other team members.

Southwest Airlines famously hires for attitude and trains for skills. Despite the company’s ongoing success, other firms often underestimate the importance of personality of potential employees. Consider conducting a well-regarded personality test (such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) at some point in the recruitment process. You can conduct these internally or use an outside provider. Who conducts the interview is important, but who conducts the test is not as important.

The hiring process can be an even trickier proposition for family-owned businesses — especially when it involves making decisions like going beyond the bloodline to bring in the best candidates at senior levels. Automaker Ford was managed on and off again by Ford family members until 2006, when the company made the strategic decision to bring in Alan Mulally, a former executive with Boeing, as Ford’s president and CEO. Although these decisions might be difficult for some families, such moves can bring great value to the businesses. In the case of Ford, the hiring of Mulally has been largely credited with returning Ford to profitabilityand avoiding bankruptcy.

Training. Although training is vital to employee retention and business growth, it is often overlooked by many middle-market business owners who are focused too tightly on day-to-day operations. Consider exploring options like online courses or sending employees to outside conferences for training. You can also bring trainers in house on a contract basis.

Larger companies may have access to more comprehensive resources that enable them to train internally. Technological solutions such as MindTickle that gamify and socialize employee training can keep businesses of any size competitive.

However, while game-style technological solutions may be useful for training entry-level staff members, they may fail to stimulate more senior executives or encourage them to stay at the leading edge of their fields. Therefore, it’s helpful to identify high-level industry conferences and events where upper-level management may connect with their peers and get inspired from the nexus of knowledge.

Workplace: Inspiring and training your employees is great, but employees also want good working conditions, compensation and benefits. More than ever, job applicants are looking beyond salary and are paying attention to the fine print related to health insurance, 401(k) plans, paid vacations and other provisions. Unfortunately, many businesses fail to provide competitive benefits packages because they don’t have the in-house human resources departments necessary to manage these benefits as well as the costs. Options like professional employer organizations that outsource human resources administration, payroll, benefits administration and other functions can enable middle-market businesses to provide the same or better benefits to their employees as larger companies — and do so at more reasonable costs.

Evaluating. Continuously examine your team all the way up the ladder, from the entry-level to the C-suite. Incentivize strong performance and enforce training to respond to sub-par performance. In so doing, you can reap maximum productivity out of your team long after the initial hiring.

When it becomes clear that a bad hire has been made or you have a problem with an employee, it’s to everyone’s benefit — including the employee’s —to end the relationship as soon as possible.

James Cassel is co-founder and chairman of Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC, an investment banking firm with headquarters in Miami. www.casselsalpeter.com

 

 

Forbes: BankUnited 8th best bank in U.S.

Click here to view original article.

By Donna Gehrke-White
December 20, 2013

Forbes named South Florida-based BankUnited, which expanded into New York this year, as one of the top 10 banks in the country.

BankUnited moved up this year from Forbes’ tenth spot to #8 this year, noted bank spokeswoman Mary Harris. “We were really excited about that,” Harris said.

It was the only Florida bank in the top 10 list. Other top banks are based in California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Texas, Hawaii and Missouri.

Forbes listed BankUnited as having $14 billion in assets while enjoying an almost 12 percent return on total equity. Only 0.5 percent of its loan portfolio was non-performing.

The bank has had a swift turnaround since the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. took it over in 2009 during the Great Recession and appointed new owners led by longtime banking executive John Kanas and Palm Beach billionaire Wilbur Ross.

The FDIC took over much of BankUnited’s bad loans, allowing the new owners — “excellent management” — to focus on improving the bank’s performance, said James Cassel, chairman and co-founder of Cassel Salpeter & Co., an independent South Florida investment banking firm.

In four years, BankUnited, which now is based in Miami Lakes, has added branches in Florida; this year it moved into New York with branches established in Manhattan, Long Island and Brooklyn. It has 39 branches in Broward and Palm Beach counties.

John Kanas, BankUnited chairman, president and CEO, said the bank will be loaning more in 2014 as it adds deposits. On Monday, BankUnited announced it had closed on a $60 million loan to refinance the Lauderdale Marine Center in Fort Lauderdale.

“We expect to see dramatic growth,” Kanas said.

Frederick’s Of Hollywood To Be Taken Private

Click here to view original article.

By Sarah Pringle
December 19, 2013

More than 19 months after hitting the auction block and managing to steer clear of another bankruptcy, Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. has agreed to be taken private in a deal that values the once-flourishing lingerie company at almost $11 million.

A consortium, comprised of New York hedge fund Harbinger Group Inc. subsidiary HGI Funding LCC and other common and preferred shareholders, has agreed to acquire the outstanding shares not already owned by the group for $0.27 a share, Frederick’s revealed on Thursday.

The agreement represents a 50% premium over Frederick’s closing price of $0.18 on Sept. 27, the day before the consortium made its initial $0.23 per share offer.

The group, which together holds 88.6% of Frederick’s common stock, will essentially be paying just $1.2 million for the approximately 4.5 million shares it doesn’t currently own. The agreement values Frederick’s at about $10.6 million.

Frederick’s, based in Hollywood, Calif., had already effectively handed control of the company over to Harbinger Group earlier this year, when an affiliate of HGI Funding, Five Island Asset Management LLC, acquired its Series B convertible preferred stock for $10 million.

Frederick’s, which was formed in 1947 by the creator of the pushup bra, Frederick Mellinger, put itself on the block on May 7, 2012, when it hired Allen & Co. LLC as financial adviser to evaluate its options after receiving a number of inquiries related to various transactions.

Less than two years earlier, Frederick’s had initiated a strategic review for its wholesale unit Movie Star Inc., which was ultimately sold to Dolce Vita Intimates LLC on Oct. 28, 2010, for an unknown price.

The outlook for Frederick’s still wasn’t looking very optimistic about two months ago, when, on Oct. 25, Mayer Hoffman McCann PC expressed substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accounting firm pointed to the once-bankrupt company’s recurring losses and negative cash flows from continuing operations, as well as its working capital and a shareholders’ deficiency.

As of Oct. 26, Frederick’s had cash and cash equivalents of just $250,000, while total debt amounted to about $24.9 million. The company has posted losses during 13 of the past 14 quarters, most recently reporting a $7.28 million loss for the first quarter ended Oct. 26.

Still, Frederick’s shareholders seemed to be enthused by the intimate apparel retailer’s latest attempt to turn the company around, which has failed over the past several years to keep up with others in the space including its mainstream rival Victoria’s Secret, which operates as part of L Brands Inc., formerly known as Limited Brands Inc.

Shares, trading on the over-the-counter market under the symbol FOHL, advanced about 30.7% midday on Thursday to $0.26, from $0.20 the previous day. Shares have climbed about 44.4% since the day prior to the consortium’s initial offer on Sept. 27.

Thursday’s agreement, which requires shareholder approval representative of at least two-thirds of the company’s outstanding stock, calls for Frederick CEO Thomas Lynch to continue serving as chief executive for three years following the merger.

Though Frederick’s appears to have escaped bankruptcy for now, that wasn’t the case 13 years ago. Frederick’s declared Chapter 11 on July 3, 2000, and on Jan. 7, 2003, the reorganized company emerged from bankruptcy controlled by a secured lender group headed by Crédit Agricole Indosuez. At the time, it had $65 million in assets and $70 million in debt.

It wasn’t until Jan. 29, 2008, that Frederick’s began trading as a public company on the New York Stock Exchange as it completed a reverse-stock merger with Movie Star and FOH Holdings Inc., its parent company at the time. Frederick’s was eventually delisted by the NYSE because of non-compliance with stockholders’ equity requirements.

Still, the lingerie company remains far from the value it once was, with a market capitalization of just $7.9 million as of Dec. 18. On Sept. 15, 2009, the company was worth about $64.93 million, representing its highest value over the last five years.

Miami-based Cassel Salpeter & Co. LLC’s James Cassel is providing financial advice to Frederick’s on the transaction, while Paul Lucido and Eric Schwartz of New York-based Graubard Miller are serving as legal advisers.

HGI Funding retained Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as legal adviser.

 

Transitioning your business to your family? Take the right steps to ensure a smooth succession plan for your business

To view original article click here.

By James S. Cassel
November 17, 2013

James S. Cassell

James S. Cassell

When transitioning businesses to their family members, many business owners are surprised to come face-to-face with something they never expected to surface in their families: the ugly side of business. Beyond the serious financial consequences and other damages that can hurt their businesses, previously harmonious families can be torn apart, often irreconcilably. In my experience, I have seen a lot, and I can tell you much of this can be avoided by taking the right steps in advance.

Many business owners think their families are above all this — they don’t need to develop succession plans or to put systems in place because everyone “loves each other” and “things will naturally fall into place.”

I saw a previously harmonious family get torn apart by animosity after the father left the business to his children without leaving any kind of voting trust or shareholder agreement. Ultimately, the one child who had been actively involved in running the business the entire time had serious issues with the siblings who were trying to tell him what to do despite the fact they knew nothing about the business. This rift damaged not only the business operation but also the family’s financial wellbeing. If the father had handled the issues with better communication and documentation before he passed away and if a partnership or clear voting/shareholder rights had been established, this crisis could have been minimized or prevented.

We were also involved with helping another business in which the two partners gave the business to their children who then gave it to each of their children with the hopes of keeping it “all in the family.” However, much to their dismay, the third generation did not get along. A simple buy-sell agreement could have helped them vent their differing views without destroying the successful business. Both wanted to own the business, but neither wanted to sell it to the other. The end result was liquation of a great business and financial loss to both families. Sometimes it is better to sell than transition.

In both cases, these families sought help when it was too late. Based on my experience navigating these complex issues, the following are some of the common pitfalls and key steps to help ensure your family’s best interest is protected when considering transitioning your business to your family members:

•  Inter-family issues: Begin by thinking about what you want to accomplish. Write it down. Sit down with your family members, and really work through these emotional issues with all key family members, including those who will be involved and those who may not be involved in the business who will be affected. Do this well in advance of your intent to turn over the business so that it becomes a “planning conversation” rather than the actual allocation of roles, responsibilities and assets. This will greatly diffuse the intense emotions and drama often connected with business transitions.

If you have multiple children, which ones are most appropriate to take over the business, and which ones should not be involved? If you have step-children, daughters-in-law or sons-in-law, how would you deal with them in the transition? If your family is not able to do it alone, consider getting a private equity firm as a partner or other professional management. Sometimes it helps to bring in a business coach.

•  Tax issues: It’s critical to consult with tax advisors upfront to protect your financial interests. Get them involved before the transition is structured. A good tax advisor can save you and your family significant sums of money and many heartaches during the transition process. This can be done in conjunction with your estate planning.

•  Allocation of control and assets: It’s important to think through who will own and run your business and to get buy-in upfront in this decision rather than trying to impose it upon your family members and employees later.

Consider what your role be during and after the transition. If you have other children and they are not in the business or won’t be part of the ownership, how do you allocate other assets so it’s equitable, and should it be equitable? What are the ramifications of transitioning to active versus non-active family members? When you are transitioning the business to family and you have long-term employees, should those employees get rights or ownership and how do you deal with the heir-apparent?

•  Valuation work: Work with qualified consultants to do valuation work to decide on the value for your business beforehand. This could affect your taxes. This also can help ensure you protect the maximum value for your business and allocate the business assets appropriately.

•  Outside capital: If you need outside capital, where will it come from? Do you establish an Employee Stock Ownership Plan to do it or do you bring a private equity firm, as there are some that focus on transitioning for family businesses?

Often, the business has been good to the family. But if not properly handled, the strong emotions and complex dynamics that come into play the moment a business is transitioned can become overwhelming and cause unexpected damage. Most business owners fall into this trap because they mistakenly assume this would never happen in their families. Without a doubt, it’s critical to talk with your family beforehand, get help from qualified attorneys, investment bankers, tax advisors and other experts, and put the right systems and documents in place. This type of strategic action and planning can help ensure you make sound decisions together, as a family, that will protect your most valuable assets: your business and your loved ones.

James Cassel is co-founder and chairman of Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC, an investment-banking firm with headquarters in Miami that works with middle-market companies. www.casselsalpeter.com

 

 

Boutique Appeal: Against the backdrop of department store consolidation, retailers and investors seek specialty shops

To view original article click here.

By Allison Collins
November 8, 2013

To protect themselves from fickle consumers and uncertain economic times, retailers are using acquisitions of specialty shops as a form of insurance. Deals such as Gap Inc.’s (NYSE: GAP) $130 million purchase of retail chain Intermix Holdco Inc. in January allow middle-market companies to break into new segments of the market. (For more, see the video below with Hadley Mullin of TSG Consumer Partners.)

Through September, 2013 has been a big year for department store deals, with about $9 billion in deal value according to data from Dealogic and provided by investment bank Robert W. Baird & Co. The year through September has seen nearly $21 billion in total retail M&A activity, which includes department store deals.

The third quarter was especially strong for U.S. retail and consumer transactions, rising 112 percent from the same quarter in the previous year, according to PwC.

“I see more opportunities in the specialty retail space than I do in the department store space,” says Al Ferrara, a partner at BDO USA LLP. Deals are coming from private equity firms that bought a retailer three to five years ago and are looking to exit, or the stores themselves, which may be looking to move into a specialty niche through acquisition, Ferrara says.

Gap’s Intermix purchase underscores that idea. By buying Intermix, a group of clothing stores that sell women’s luxury apparel, the company enters an entirely new space. When Gap made the acquisition, Intermix operated 32 boutiques across North America. Gap says it is seeking to expand the brand’s network of stores and enhance the company’s website. Stores are scheduled to open soon in Chestnut Hill, Mass., Brooklyn, N.Y., and Bellevue, Wash.

cs media clip pic 1

“Smart companies are trying to bulletproof themselves by having concepts at different price points and target audiences; therefore, if one should face headwinds, you have the others,” says Jane Hali (pictured), vice president of custom research for London-based trend forecasting agency WGSN Group Inc., about the Intermix deal.

Gap has businesses at all ends of the market. It has Old Navy at the low end; Gap in the middle; Banana Republic  in the middle but above Gap; Athleta, which gives them a specialization in a specific market; and Piperlime, a pure e-commerce business. The acquisition of Intermix adds a specialty store, with a very select assortment of clothes, to Gap’s holdings. The deal was Gap’s first since 2008, when it paid $150 million for Athleta, which sells exercise clothes. The company bought Banana Republic in 1983.

In October, rumors swirled that suit chain Men’s Wearhouse Inc. (NYSE: MW) may bid for shoemaker Allen Edmonds Corp. in a move that could strengthen the chain. That news came around the same time that Houston-based Men’s Wearhouse rejected a $2.3 billion takeover offer from Jos. A. Bank Clothiers Inc., which also operates a chain of retail stores. If that deal had not been rejected it would have expanded Jos. A. Bank’s product offerings into tuxedo rental and casual wear. In July 2012, Men’s Wearhouse acquired men’s clothier Joseph Abboud through a $97.5 million deal for its owner, JA Holding Inc.

Specialty retailers have also attracted the interest of private equity firms.

Private Equity Involvement

In October, London-based private equity firm Permira Funds agreed to buy the parent company of Dr Martens, R Griggs Group Ltd., for about $486 million. Dr Martens makes apparel, shoes and accessories sold in 63 countries. Permira has also invested in Hugo Boss AG and Valentino.

Private equity firm Apax Partners closed a $1.1 billion deal for apparel chain Rue21 Inc. in a take-private transaction in October. Apax, headquartered in New York and London, has a history of investing in retail companies. In November 2012, the firm paid $570 million to buy Cole Haan from Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE). Before that, the firm invested in Takko, a value fashion retailer in Europe in 2011, and Spyder Active Sports Inc., which makes performance wear, in 2004. Apax also invested in Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. in 2003 and Tommy Hilfiger Corp. in 2006, and has exited both investments.

In April, New York private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. LP (NYSE: KKR) announced the purchase of a majority stake in Paris-based SMCP Group, a clothing retailer. SMCP’s brands include Sandro, Sandro Men, Maje and Claudie Pierlot. SMCP had opened 69 stores in North America during the 18 months before that sale was announced.

New York private equity firm Sycamore Partners said it would buy Hot Topic Inc. for about $600 million in March. Hot Topic is a mall and web-based retailer that sells music and pop-culture influenced apparel, accessories, music and gifts. The company also owns Torrid, which sells clothing for women size 12 and up, and Blackheart, which sells lingerie and beauty products. Sycamore is also invested in apparel chain Talbots.

In January, Boston private equity firm TA Associates completed a majority investment in Dutch LLC, which is the parent company for fashion lines Joie, Equipment and Current/Elliot. Those brands are sold in high-end department stores, including Saks, Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus and Barney’s.

TA, which acquired a 60 percent stake in the company, plans to focus on building out retail locations for the companies and developing an e-commerce site for Current/Elliot, TA Associates principal James Hart tells Mergers & Acquisitions in an interview.

In December 2012, Los Angeles private equity firm Leonard Green & Partners LP bought a 25 percent stake in the Topshop apparel chain from British billionaire Philip Green for $805 million. Leonard Green also co-owns J. Crew. The firm had previously invested in David’s Bridal, but sold the chain to Clayton Dubilier & Rice in October 2012 for $1.05 billion.

“Specialty retailers are able to appeal to a very specific segment of the market that broader generalists are finding it more difficult to appeal to,” says Maud Brown, a managing director at Bahrain private equity firm Investcorp, which owns retailers Sur La Table and Paper Source. Investcorp also owns SourceMedia, Mergers & Acquisitions’ publisher.

“The department store model has been challenged for many years. Various department stores have tried to reinvent themselves, but the brands – be they specialty retailers or brands themselves – are trying to get a direct relationship with their end customer,” Brown says.

Many brands that are sold through department stores have opened brick-and-mortar locations. A significant portion of those companies have both wholesale and retail models, so they still work with and sell their products in department stores, as well as in their own locations, Hali says.

“The only way for the manufacturers to have full distribution is really to open their own stores, and that is what many of them are doing,” Hali says.

Peter Millar, a high-end men’s apparel line, has opened two stores and has plans for more.

The company, which aims to outfit 35- to 50-year old men for the office, weekend, golf course and tailgate, recently opened a store in South Hampton, N.Y., and another location in Palm Beach, Fla. Peter Millar is sold in Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom stores, as well as through smaller retailers.

“I suspect in the next 18 months we’ll have four more locations,” says CEO Scott Mahoney. For Peter Millar, the retail locations are a chance to express and market the essence of the brand. The company is considering locations in New York, Chicago, Charleston, Austin, Dallas and other places, but “it’s not going to be a 50-store play,” Mahoney says.

This is not the first time we have seen this phenomenon. In the 1990s, when the outdoor apparel space exploded, North Face, which makes outdoor performance-wear, began opening stores, says Robert W. Baird & Co. managing director Joe Pellegrini (pictured).

cs media clip pic2“They can control their own destiny better when they have their own store,” says James Cassel, chairman of Miami investment bank Cassel Salpeter & Co., but that does not mean they will pull out of the larger stores.

E-commerce gives brands another way to increase customer awareness, which can generally help sales. “Department stores like the idea that their brands have full online businesses — it makes the brands more important to the customer and top-of-mind,” says Hali.

Brands are seeing a higher percentage of revenue that comes from more than just department store sales, according to Pellegrini. “Having a well-positioned website only raises the awareness level of the brands,” Pellegrini says. “They’re seeing a higher percentage of their revenues being derived from an omnichannel approach, which includes direct sales and online.”

For middle market brands, experts agree that increased size could help companies work more easily with large department store conglomerates.

In October, Hanes Brands Inc. acquired Iselin, N.J.-based Maidenform Brands Inc. for $583 million. The deal gave Hanes ownership of Maidenform, Flexees, Lilyette, Self Expressions and Sweet Nothings, adding to the brands it already owned: Playtex, Bali, Just My Size, Hanes, Barely There, Wonderbra, Champion and L’eggs.

“They have more leverage” with department stores, Hali says, since they are larger as a combined company. That deal also resulted in production synergies, as Hanes owns many manufacturing facilities. Before the deal, Maidenform had been using a third-party manufacturer.

PVH Corp. (NYSE: PVH) also gained leverage with stores when it bought Warnaco Group Inc. In that deal, which closed in February, the company picked up the rest of the jeans and underwear portions of Calvin Klein (it already owned the rest), as well as Speedo, Body Nancy Ganz/Bodyslimmers, Warner’s and Olga. PVH also owns the Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, Izod and Arrow lines.

Aside from PVH, several brand owners have scooped up more companies to increase their portfolios.

In September, Paris-based clothing and accessories company Kering bought a minority stake in luxury brand Altuzarra, which is sold at Barney’s, on Net-a-Porter.com, Bergdorf Goodman and other stores. Kering develops apparel and accessories for luxury and lifestyle brands, including Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Saint Laurent, Alexander McQueen, McQ, Balenciaga, Brioni, Christopher Kane, Stella McCartney, Sergio Rossi, Boucheron, Girard-Perregaux, JeanRichard, Qeelin, Puma, Volcom, Cobra, Electric and Tretorn. The company was known as Pinault-Printemps-Redoute or PPR until June, when it changed its name to Kering.

In August, Authentic Brands Group LLP, which is backed by private equity firm Leonard Green, picked up Spyder Active Sports Inc. for an undisclosed amount. The Boulder, Colo.-based ski and snow outfitter sells jackets, snow pants and cold-weather accessories. Spyder was added to Authentic Brands’ portfolio, which already included brands Judith Leiber, Andrienne Vittadini and Viking.

In July, LVMH Moet Hennessey Louis Vuitton SA said it would buy Italian cashmere company Loro Piana SpA for about $2.6 billion, following the company’s 2011 deal for Bulgari SpA. The Loro Piana purchase expands LVMH’s depth in the luxury goods segment, where it already owned Louis Vuitton, Celine, Kenzo, Marc Jacobs, Emilio Pucci, Thomas Pink and others.

In February, Iconix Brand Group Inc. (Nasdaq: ICON), which owns Ed Hardy, Rocawear and Candie’s, bought London denim label Lee Cooper for $72 million. Also that month, Iconix said it would buy sportswear and denim label Buffalo David Bitton from Buffalo International LLC for $76.5 million in cash. Those deals follow a November 2012 acquisition of soccer-related product manufacturer Umbro, which Iconix bought from Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE) for $225 million. New York-based Iconix licenses clothing brands to retailers and manufacturers.

Vida Shoes International Inc., a New York footwear brand owner, acquired Andre Assous Co., an Oceanside, N.Y.-based footwear company known for espadrilles in January. Vida licenses shoes for Baby Phat, Carter’s, Osh Kosh, Esprit, Sag Harbor South Pole and Unionbay and other companies.

Department Store Consolidation

Middle market companies and brands face increased pressure from department stores as consolidation continues.

In November, Hudson’s Bay Co. closed a $2.9 billion deal for Saks Inc. That deal brought together Hudson’s Bay’s namesake stores in Canada, Home Outfitters, which is a home goods store; Lord & Taylor, a department store that sells apparel, home good and small appliances; and Saks and Saks Off 5th, the chain’s group of outlet stores.

“There is going to be more pressure from the larger retail conglomerates for there are fewer stores for the brands to sell to,” says Hali.

In addition to the Saks deal, Neiman Marcus Inc. changed hands.

Ares Management LLC and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board bought luxury retailer Neiman Marcus for about $6 billion in October. Neiman owns high-end retailer Bergdorf Goodman.

Neiman, a Dallas-based chain, was last purchased by TPG Capital and Warburg Pincus in a 2005 leveraged buyout. The private equity firms filed paperwork with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an initial public offering in June, but ultimately decided to sell instead. TPG and

Warburg Pincus reportedly paid about $1.2 billion for the department store in 2005.

In a previous wave of department store mergers, we saw Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: M), then known as Federated Department Stores (after R.H. Macy & Co. agreed to a merger in 1994), merge in 2005 with the May Department Stores Co., owner of Filene’s, the Jones Store, Kaufmann’s and other stores, to create a combined company with more than 1,000 stores.

In 2006, the company sold Lord & Taylor to Purchase, N.Y.-based private equity firm NRDC Equity Partners LLC, which owned Hudson’s Bay. Macy’s owns luxury retailer Bloomingdales.

With so few department stores, it is unlikely that we will see further consolidation in the space, experts say, but potential targets could include Dillard’s, and possibly J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (NYSE: JCP).

Large department store deals can make it difficult for smaller brands to get into the stores, according to Baird’s Pellegrini.

“They are going to be far pickier and demanding of the vendors,” Pellegrini says of large department stores.

As retailers grow larger and more sophisticated, they tend to want to work with fewer vendors, and with those that have a similar level of infrastructure sophistication.

“There are a lot of young up-and-coming companies with great brands and products, but to service a large base of department stores, making sure the right inventory is on the shelf is difficult,” says Pellegrini.

What happens first when you integrate an acquisition is vendor rationalization: “The more you buy from certain vendors, the higher the discount,” says Cynthia Cohen (pictured), CEO of Strategic Mind share, a consulting firm for retailers. Cohen is also on the board of directors at apparel chain Bebe. If department stores consolidated buying, it could lead to some of the clothing lines being dropped, Cohen says.

“If they consolidated buying, that gives the stores more power, but department stores and good brands understand they are partners and they both need to be in business. One can’t put the other out of business. It’s sort of like shooting themselves in the head,” says Cassel.

 

 

Debt deliberations: Startups experts say deal can’t come too soon

To view original article click here.

By: Kent Bernhard Jr
October 15, 2013

The UpTake: Senate leaders say they’re on their way to a deal to raise the debt ceiling and reopen the federal government. That’s a good thing for the startup ecosystem, where Washington infighting is causing hesitancy for investors.

Editor’s Note: This story was modified to reflect today’s developments in the U.S. House of Representatives.

A deal to end the government shutdown and raise the debt ceiling can’t come too soon for the startup ecosystem, say experts.

But it looked early this afternoon as though the wait will be longer. Though Senate leaders have come close to a bipartisan agreement to reopen the government and raise the debt ceiling, the House is in disarray. House GOP leaders this morning floated their own plan to do the same, but apparently couldn’t sell their idea to a majority of their Republican colleagues.

“You have uncertainty right now,” Barry Sloane, the chief executive of Newtek, which provides small business lending and services, told me. “If you are an investor today, looking to invest in an early stage business, you’ve got to hesitate. There’s a lot of stuff on hold.”

Add to that “stuff” bipartisan negotiations in the Senate. Senators had appeared close to an agreement, but put their talks on hold to wait and see if a plan would emerge from the House of Representatives. As of late this afternoon, House leaders had come up with a plan and a vote was slated for tonight.

The dithering in Washington led to nervousness on Wall Street, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 188 points. An auction of short term government bonds drew scant interest, as traders weighed the risk of a debt ceiling breach Thursday.

The agreement Senators were negotiating would raise the debt ceiling through February 7, removing the threat that the government could default on its obligations as early as Thursday. It would also reopen parts of the government that have been shut down, and fund federal agencies through mid-January.

The possibility of funding drying up is the biggest impact the drama in Washington has on startups, said Erik Kantz, a dealmaking lawyer at Arnstein & Lehr in Chicago. He said a breach of the debt ceiling, because it would shake the confidence of markets worldwide, could have a trickle-down effect to the wealthy angel investors who feed startups their early-stage cash.

“It dries up the capital that’s available,” he told me.

Some of that’s already happening with the shutdown, Sloane said. He pointed out the Small Business Administration-backed lending is at a standstill because of the shutdown. And investors are already acting more cautiously.

“What everyone’s doing…you’re continuing to line up business it’s a question of whether you’re closing things,” Sloane said. “I think it’s a small but significant subset of the investment community that is doing nothing.”

And if the Senate leaders fail in their effort to get a debt ceiling deal, or that deal is rejected in the House, things could get really bad, really quickly.

“You could wake up one morning, if this is all pushed out…and the markets don’t accept it anymore,” he said. “You could have a 10 percent correction of the stock markets in a day.”

And if something like that happens, it can’t help but trickle into every form of finance, including the bets investors make on startups.

James Cassel of Miami investment bank Cassel Salpeter was more blunt.

“I think it will have worldwide long-term impacts,” he said of the possibility of a debt ceiling breach. “I think it’s going to have a devastating effect. They’re playing with fire. I think someone needs to hit them over the head with a baseball bat.”

 

 

Anticipating the hike in interest rates: A little planning can have benefits

To view original article click here.

By James S. Cassel
October 20, 2013

James S. Cassell

James S. Cassell

Now that the government is back in business, it’s time to think about interest rates. With interest rates having recently begun to rise and currently expected to climb higher than today’s historically low rates, it’s important for middle-market business owners to begin planning and preparing for the likely impacts on their businesses and finding ways to lock down the most favorable long-term rates. A little strategic action now can go a long way to help put their companies in the best-possible financial position.

Many business owners do not understand all of the potential impacts that rising rates may have on their businesses, including affecting their profitability and value, and how serious the impacts can be. Higher interest rates mean higher costs for borrowing money and financing equipment. They affect almost everything, including the interest rates charged on lines of credit that have floating rates as well as both the interest rates and the coverage ratios that affect the ability to refinance term loans when they become due.

Interest rates also can have significant impacts on the valuations of businesses. Although rising interest rates won’t affect Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, they will have an impact on business cash flow. Most significantly, however, they can affect potential buyers of businesses, as they will probably have to pay higher interest rates when they borrow money to the leverage their purchases of businesses. This may cause valuation gaps or discourage them from making the acquisitions. In a nutshell, the higher interest rates affect debt service coverage ratios. The higher the interest rates, the lower the amounts that may be borrowed. As a result, there’s a good possibility that business valuations will be affected as interest rates rise.

With all this considered, now is a good time to begin taking steps to ensure that you can secure the lowest-possible interest rates for your business over the long term. How should you go about this? Some strategies:

•  Take advantage of today’s historically low rates. If you’re planning to take out any new loans or can renegotiate existing ones, there’s no time like the present. Aim to lock in long-term rates or hedge the rates whenever possible.

•  Get liquid. Use your excess cash flow now to pay down as much of your debt as possible, provided you do not see a need in the foreseeable future to borrow the money back.

•  Get creative. Approach different lenders, such as trying community banks rather than national banks. Both have their pros and cons, but it might be in your best interest to work with a smaller lender that’s hungrier and more flexible for your business in order to lock in lower rates and more favorable terms.

•  If you choose to expand your business credit line, owner-occupied real estate loan or any other type of loan, use your newly found capital wisely to penetrate new markets and invest in the right people, technologies, equipment and other resources to support your business.

•  Government programs like SBA-type programs might offer lower fixed rates that are more favorable. Although it’s not always a good idea to put up your house as collateral for your business loans, if you do find yourself in the position of having to do this, you should consider locking in those interest rates for the longest-possible terms.

•  Keep in mind that some loans that are based on using cash flow as collateral might be good, less expensive options if you can provide acceptable collateral. You might consider converting some of your loans and/or changing lenders to take advantage of better terms offered by different lenders. Be careful when getting unsecured loans: Giving up the collateral is not always ideal.

•  Consider specialty lenders. Look for lenders who specialize in specific areas, as they may help you secure better terms. If you can pit multiple lenders in a bidding war against each other, you probably can get better deals.

In addition to ensuring that you are borrowing money at the most favorable long-term rates, it’s always a good idea to consult qualified, trusted advisors, such as attorneys, investment bankers and CPAs. By doing some smart planning now and taking the right strategic steps, you can strengthen your business and put it in the best position for both the short and long term.

James Cassel is co-founder and chairman of Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC, an investment-banking firm with headquarters in Miami that works with middle-market companies. www.casselsalpeter.com

 

Top 12 Tips to Get the Most Value from the Sale of Your Middle-Market Business

To view original article click here.

By James Cassel
October 17, 2013

A little planning can go a long way toward helping you to obtain the maximum value for your business. The sooner you begin, the better.

Throughout my career in leading the sales and purchases of middle-market businesses nationwide, I’ve found the following 12 tips to be the most helpful for business owners planning to sell. The further in advance of the sale that these recommendations are implemented, the greater the value that can be created. They’re also generally good business practice for anyone in business.

  1. Make sure that your financial and accounting records are in order so that you can readily give potential buyers a clear, accurate snapshot of your historical financial results and condition. This is critical to ensuring that you get top value for your business. It’s also a good idea to prepare a budget and maybe get audited financials.
  2. Review and/or restructure your agreements with customers as necessary. Do your contracts have special terms, such as change of control provisions or requirements that you personally provide services, that may affect the longevity of the contracts when you’re no longer involved with the business?
  3. Review and, if necessary, restructure your leases. Often, long-term leases for excess space and high rates can be roadblocks to completing deals, while the opposite is true for long-term leases at favorable or below-market rates. Do you have a long-term lease that new buyers will have to continue or any special clauses that will create issues for potential buyers?
  4. Review and/or restructure agreements with your suppliers. As in #2 and #3 above, you should determine whether you’re locked into agreements that may not appeal to potential new buyers or reduce value. Now would be a good time to try to modify or terminate any agreements that you don’t consider favorable to avoid turning off potential buyers.
  5. Review your insurance coverage. Consult a trusted insurance agent to evaluate your current coverage and fill any gaps that may exist. For example, depending on your business, liability coverage and tail coverage might be critical.
  6. Do your personal tax and estate planning. Consult with qualified lawyers and accountants to ensure that you have structured your ownership in the most tax-advantaged way in the event of a sale. Doing this now vs. just before a sale can be very advantageous.
  7. If you have a family-owned business, talk with your family. Make sure that your family members and other key stakeholders fully understand the possible impacts of the business sale on everyone involved. Especially if your family members either work at or are dependent on your business, it’s critical to have their buy-in.
  8. Evaluate your intellectual property. Work with qualified attorneys to make sure that it’s well protected and owned or licensed by the right entities. Also, make sure that you have proper licenses for all of the software you use.
  9. Evaluate management. Ensure that you have appropriate management in place and that there are no gaps that you should fill before you put your business on the market. Also, examine your employment agreements to ensure that you have the necessary noncompete, confidentiality, and other provisions.
  10. Determine whether there are environmental issues. Either remediate them or at least develop an accurate understanding of what will be required to do so.
  11. Get organized. This gives a good impression and strong comfort level to potential buyers, which is a priceless intangible.
  12. Hire an effective public relations and marketing firm. Positive news coverage in credible media outlets that reach potential buyers as well as current and potential customers can help to elevate firm and brand awareness, secure credibility for your business, and even generate inquiries from potential buyers. Depending on the nature of your business, social media might be an appropriate tool to leverage as well.

Without a doubt, the tips listed above are general good business practice, even if you’re not thinking of selling yet. The key is to work with qualified advisors, including attorneys, accountants, and investment bankers, who can give you the strategic counsel and guidance you need to put your business in the best possible position. It is a good idea to assemble the team far in advance of a contemplated sale. By minimizing the weaknesses and playing up your strengths now, you can help to ensure that you get the best value for your business whenever you’re ready to sell.

LOLJames Cassel (jcassel@casselsalpeter.com) is cofounder and chairman of Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC (www.casselsalpeter.com), an investment banking firm with headquarters in Miami that works with middle-market companies. Before founding Cassel Salpeter & Co., Jim was co-founder and chairman of Capitalink, an investment banking firm that was acquired by Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., a New York Stock Exchange member firm where Jim continued and served as vice chairman, senior managing director, and head of investment banking. He also was chairman of a significant company that owned hospitals.

Yellen appointment at the Fed seen as a positive for startups

To view original article click here.

By: Kent Bernhard Jr
October 09, 2013

The UpTake: Janet Yellen isn’t expected to change the Federal Reserve’s easy money policies much, and experts say that’s good for the upstart economy.

Janet Yellen brings arguably more expertise and experience to the job of Federal Reserve chairman than anyone before her. But what does her appointment mean to the upstart economy?

“My big picture view is that stability and the Fed’s recent accommodative policies are good for the startup ecosystem,” said Stash Jacobs, an attorney with Miami-based Greenberg Traurig who works on mergers and acquisitions and funding deals for startups.

President Barack Obama nominated Yellen today to the post being vacated by Ben Bernanke. The first woman appointed to the most powerful economic post in the world, she comes to the job with a wealth of experience.

Most recently, she has served as the Fed’s vice chairman. She has held previous posts as head of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank and the Council of Economic Advisors.

If the Senate confirms her, she will take over at a time of continued economic duress, with the Fed pumping money into the economy through low short-term interest rates and a mechanism called quantitative easing to try and stimulate the economy and ease unemployment.

Don’t look for that to change, at least in the near future, and that’s a good thing for startups and entrepreneurs.

That’s because the Fed’s easy money policy drives down the attractiveness of such traditional investments as CDs and bonds, leading more money to enter the stock market—good for companies like Twitter that are going public—and even to direct investments by institutional investors in venture capital funds, the feeder system for startup investment.

Such investments as venture capital are more attractive, if riskier, because they offer a higher rate of return than traditional investment vehicles, especially at a time of low interest rates.

“When IPOs are happening, that’s great for startup companies because it builds confidence,” Jacobs told me. And with other investments perhaps less attractive, “It can cause investors to be interested in venture capital and early stage investing as well.”

James Cassel, co-founder of investment bank Cassel Salpeter, said the Fed’s policies could also have a more direct impact on entrepreneurs and would-be entrepreneurs. The lower interest rate policies of the Fed have a positive effect on the housing market, which can encourage someone thinking of entrepreneurship to take the leap into it.

“If the fed can encourage growth and keep down inflation, it can be good for the ecosystem,” Cassel told me. “You’re willing to invest…or take that business risk of starting a company without getting paid for a while.”

 

 

 

Lower Middle-Market M&A Expected to Pick Up; Cash ‘Not Being Lent Stupidly’

October, 07, 2013
By David Holley

Click the article and image below to expand it and view it in PDF format. James Cassel’s Q&A can be found on page 7.

Click the article and image below to expand it and view it in PDF format: